- About us
- Warranty Products
- Insurance Products
- Contact us
- Get a Quote
Over ten yearsexperience in the industry
We can offerFull market comparison
Accepted bymajority of high street banks
Recognised by theCouncil of Mortgage Lenders
Birmingham is undergoing a Renaissance. Chosen to host the Commonwealth Games in 2022, and with the arrival of HS2 getting ever closer, the city is seeing unprecedented amounts of development and regeneration.
The Government too has invested in the city, providing hubs for 5,000 civil servants. Another Department of Transport hub is also likely to be added soon.
According to EG Radius, Birmingham is racing ahead with its development activity for regional cities. Since the beginning of 2016, Birmingham has seen 688 applications for new commercial projects (the largest for a regional city). There have also been 264 applications for residential schemes, second only to Manchester with 316.
No other UK regional city surpassed its 12,200 new units that came through in planning applications during the pandemic in 2020. And it would seem that Birmingham is well placed to keep the momentum going post pandemic, as many of these proposals start to come to life with construction. Cranes pepper the skyline and there is a feeling of optimism that surrounds the city.
Grenfell legacy leaves thousands of leaseholders in unsaleable flats and with astronomical bills four years on from the tragedy.
The anniversary of the Grenfell fire tragedy, in which 72 died and many more were left traumatised, injured and homeless, is a grim reminder of a terrible night. But it also started a process which has left thousands of leaseholders living in flats they cannot sell; because of unsafe fire issues and the prospect of enormous bills to fix the problems.
According to an article in The Times, “four years after Grenfell, tower blocks are still covered in lethal cladding. Flat-owners are now receiving bills to make the buildings safe — and discovering to their horror that they exceed the value of their homes”.
The Government has now offered a total of £5.1bn to remove the dangerous cladding on the highest risk blocks. However, thousands of dangerous buildings remain; and costs are estimated to be closer to £16bn to make all buildings safe.
A Government bill was defeated in the House of Lords in March 2021 which would have prevented the bill for remedial work, such as the removal of unsafe cladding from blocks of flats, being passed to leaseholders and tenants. Baroness Pinnock described the situation as an “unresolved crisis of major proportions” which can only be fixed with upfront funding from the government. The life-threatening issue of flammable cladding was not in any way the fault of families in flats. But, they were being asked to “pay the price“, she said.
In 2019, an EWS1 testing system was introduced to see if buildings met safety standards. Only 1 in 10 sites passed this test. Without the EWS1 certificate, lenders will not provide mortgages, and valuations of flats are put at £0.
Many of the large developers who were responsible for installing the cladding – and who continue to make enormous profits from ongoing developments – are attempting to dump the costs onto the innocent leaseholders. Many feel the blame and costs should be with those who built the blocks; as well as the regulators (government and councils) who approved them. It has been suggested that planning consent should not be granted for new developments until the existing buildings are fixed.
Even for those who are not wishing to move, costs have escalated. Service charges have increased dramatically to cover the cost of the ‘waking watch’ (security guards who must patrol the site day and night to watch out for fires).
People are being forced to live not only with the constant worry of an unsafe building, but with additional anxieties caused by unknown and ever increasing costs; whilst the developers and owners of the buildings seem to be getting away with everything.
It seems that fairies are not the only ones to be found living at the bottom of the garden these days!
With house prices continuing to rise and a lack of affordable housing stock; one option that is becoming more popular is to build at the bottom of the garden.
Care needs to be taken to ensure correct planning and compliance with local council garden development policies is in place. But, it can be an affordable way to help younger members of the family get on the housing ladder; or to allow older members to downsize without having to move away.
A new Government scheme, Help to Build, was launched last month. This is a £150 million pound scheme offering loans to put towards a deposit to build a new home.
In many circumstances, once the children have flown the nest, owners are left living in large houses that they do not need. Many also have large gardens which they can no longer tend.
Instead of having to move from an area that is familiar and well loved, people are instead looking to sell the existing family home to the next generation to raise their families. This releases enough capital to then build themselves a smaller residence in the garden.
Alternatively, with the increase in easy to build summer houses and other habitable spaces in gardens, parents are building log cabin type homes. These enable grown children to live independently whilst saving for their own property; something that is impossible if they have to pay rent on a flat.
Lockdown has led to many people rethinking their living arrangements. Homes at the bottom of the garden can be a multi-generational answer to many questions faced by homeowners.
Are you considering building a new home in your garden? It would be wise to get a warranty in place that would allow the sale of the new home independently of the main residence. For further information, please contact Ed, Kelly or Rob on 01284 365345 or email firstname.lastname@example.org / email@example.com.
With the deadline for the stamp duty holiday looming, the demand to get sales across the line in time has created a huge bottleneck of work for all those involved in the conveyancing chain.
We have heard of solicitors advising they cannot take on any more work due to being at breaking point.
As a result, there has been an enormous increase in costs to the buyer created by the huge demand over supply.
Homeowners have saved on average £11,566 in stamp duty since the holiday was introduced last July. According to Halifax, the rush to get a property completed by 30th June 2021 has led to a huge workload for conveyancing firms and a massive hike in fees. However, buyers seem to be prepared to pay to ensure their sale is top of the list and will make the deadline.
A client of ours told us they phoned 29 removal firms and were quoted four times the normal price for moving house at the end of this month, but had no choice but to accept it!
Many removal firms are not accepting work unless exchange has already taken place. This has led to disreputable firms cashing in on the demand. There is no requirement for firms to be registered with the British Association of Removers (BAR).
Effectively anybody with a van can call themselves a remover but such companies often have no insurance. They are also likely to leave you high and dry if they get an offer for a more lucrative job; not to mention the risk of damage and stolen goods!
Surveyors are similarly charging any fee they choose for full building surveys. Mortgages are also taking longer from ‘in principle’ to ‘formal’ offer.
Whilst this demand will start to correct itself after the end of June, the pressure to move things along quickly has resulted in the whole process of buying a property taking less time than a year ago. According to Hamptons International, it is taking 92 days from an offer being accepted to exchange of contracts; whereas last summer it was taking nearly six weeks longer. Hopefully, this will remain the timescale even after the stamp duty deadline passes.
Demand is outstripping supply in construction. The main causes are:
All these factors have had an impact on the availability and price of materials. With the highest recorded demand in recent years for construction in both the public and private sectors, it is easy to see why the wait for roof tiles has gone from 2 weeks to 20 weeks. Building materials also increased in price by 25%-150% over the last twelve months.
The first three months of 2021 saw enquiries with local building firms increase at their fastest rate in a decade; fuelling significant difficulties with construction material shortages, according to new data from the Federation of Master Builders (FMB).
The latest FMB State of Trade Survey found that workloads, enquiries and employment all grew in the period January to March 2021, with enquiries growing at their fastest pace in more than 10 years.
But at the same time, 38% of builders are struggling to hire bricklayers and 34% are struggling to hire carpenters/joiners, up from 23% from the end of last year.
If you can manage to secure a builder, delays caused by factory closures and the demands of HS2 on suppliers (who, in some cases, have committed all their aggregate to the project), plus Brexit and the chaos caused in the Suez Canal earlier in the year, mean that you need to be looking 3 – 6 months in advance to organise supply with your builder and merchant.
“Don’t just turn up at your builder’s merchants and expect materials to be on the shelf” says John Newcomb, Chief Executive of the Builders Merchants Federation. Newcomb also suggests looking at alternatives such as composite decking instead of timber and clay roof tiles as an alternative to concrete.
Buying reclaimed materials is another way to avoid the shortages and can save you money.
However you decide to source the materials, be aware that prices may still rise and make sure you have a contract in place with your builder that determines who is taking the risk. A quote today for £15,000 may be closer to £20,000 when the job is completed, and without a contract, there can be costly legal disputes further down the road.
Perhaps the wisest thing is to wait. With the Government using construction as a catalyst for the economy post pandemic, once things have opened up, people’s focus may shift from the lockdown renovations to other things and the market will return to a more normal footing.
It would seem that even the mega rich are thinking twice about the need for such ostentatious luxury as foreclosure looms for the developer of ‘The One’, the largest and most expensive mansion to be built in the US.
Nile Niami, the developer renowned for exceptional mansions for the super-rich, has been filed with a default notice for $82 million as the house has failed to get anywhere near its $500 million price tag.
Built over the last eight years, the house sits on five acres overlooking Los Angeles. With a record 100,000 sq ft of living space; the master suite alone is larger than most homes at 4,000 sq ft.
Luxuries include 5 swimming pools, a 50-seat theatre, its own nightclub, bowling alley, putting green and beauty salon.
However, in the current slump post-Covid, a sale is proving hard to come by. America’s super mansion market has collapsed during the pandemic and prices are being slashed. Perhaps even the super-rich realised they have no need for their own nightclub; or maybe these houses are finally just too big.
Whatever the cause, it certainly seems that at the time of an international pandemic and global crisis, even the wealthiest are reluctant to be seen investing in such ostentation.
With strong growth showing in the latest Halifax house price data, what is keeping the house price rise from crashing?
Granite Building Warranties Ltd has recently arranged the latent defects insurance for two new high-quality, 2500 sq ft houses near Bury St Edmunds. Construction commenced in mid March 2021. We are now pleased to be at DPC on Plot One, with foundations being poured on Plot Two.
The images above and below (1 & 2) provide a very good example of block and beam flooring; demonstrating how it fits structurally on the foundations to create the solid ground floor, enabling a minimum 150mm gap below to ensure ventilation to the sub floor. This is a recognised building method, quick to install and used extensively in construction. Image 3 shows an example of shuttering, where deeper foundations have been used. Image 4 shows completed strip foundations poured and ready for brickwork.
The houses are being built by regionally renowned Maple Building Services Ltd. Construction is due for completion in November 2021, and will be retained by the owner as long term rental investments.
Gable End Wall: A gable end wall is the triangular section of wall supporting two sides of a sloping roof. The phrase may also be used to describe the whole of the end wall of a building which includes a gable (Source: Surveyor Local).
On most modern houses, the roof tiles or slates extend over the top of a gable end wall. There is then some form of weatherproofing added between tile and brickwork to stop the ingress of rainwater. Bargeboards are often fixed to the horizontal timbers (or Purlins) of the roof when these rest on the top of the wall.
Gable end walls may also rise above the roof line. In this case, Flashing must be inserted to seal the junction of the roof tiles or slates and the inner surface of the wall. Gable end walls rising above the roof line may be finished in a slope; following the slope of the roof, or as stepped, corbel or Dutch gables. The wall should be capped or finished in such a way that rainwater runs off and cannot penetrate the wall.
Because gable end walls rise above the level of the main walls of a building, they are susceptible to damage from high winds. This should not be a problem when they are properly braced. But if suffering from a lack of lateral restraint, the following damage can arise:
On properties where the gable end wall rises above the roof line, the top of the wall should be finished in such a way that rainwater cannot permeate the wall. A coping or brick detail will suffice. If this finish decays or cracks, then water and frost action can severely damage the wall.
A structural survey will show any apparent defects caused by any of these problems, and suggest possible remedial action. If the surveyor considers that any gable end wall is not properly braced, then bracing can be inserted in the roof space. If a wall has already suffered damage, it may be necessary to rebuild the wall as well as installing bracing.
An investigation by Property Week has identified that London’s local planning authorities are sitting on at least £1.29 billion in unspent developer contributions.
Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and Section 106 contributions are made by developers as part of the planning process; to be spent on local infrastructure to help mitigate the impact of development on the area.
Previously, in 2019, Property Week found that 63% of the money local authorities received from developers between 2013 and 2018 had not been spent. And it seems the trend is continuing.
The sums involved could be much higher. Local authorities are required by law to publish Infrastructure Funding Statements (IFS) by the end of 2020. But, one in five failed to do so, and of those that did, a third provided incomplete information.
Barry Jessup, director at the developer First Base, complains that this collective failure to spend the money is breaking promises made within the consent of the developer and the local authority to the community regarding how the development can benefit the community. But, developers have no control over whether the promise is kept by the local authority when the money is handed over. Such a large amount of unspent money shows that CIL is not achieving what it was supposed to do.
Local authorities, in their defence, state that they are saving money towards large infrastructure projects; rather than spending it on piecemeal improvements. To ensure the funding is available to complete such projects, funding needs to be collected over a number of years. This is understandable, given the complex nature of large infrastructure projects. But it doesn’t take into account why many have not allocated the money in their IFS. The reasons for not spending the money may be acceptable. However, there is no excuse for not allocating it to the various projects it is intended for.
As the local authorities are now required to publish an IFS each year, the scrutiny these figures are under will increase. So, it will be harder for councils to justify why they are keeping such enormous sums in reserve.
Copyright © 2021 Granite Building Warranties
Marketing by Unity Online
Granite Building Warranties Ltd is an Appointed Representative of Richdale Brokers & Financial Services Ltd which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Granite Building Warranties is a company registered in England and Wales (Company Number 11497543) with its registered office at 1st Floor, 5 Century Court, Tolpits Lane, Watford, WD18 9PX.”